Every VMworld so far has carried out an over whelming number of innovative announcements that hit us over a short period of few days, & this VMworld is no exception. In this post, I have decided to summarize the top announcement made at VMworld 2012. I will start by pointing the ones announced today, & will add to them if I find more announcement to make it to my top announcements list. I believe just the ones announced today will be a total game changer and will leave us with a lot to play with till the next VMwolrd and maybe beyond that. That have been said, let’s look at some of these great announcements:
vSphere Related Announcements:
– vSphere 5.1 is here with many enhancement and new features. For the full list of enhancement and features of vSphere 5.1, you might want to check out: https://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/products/vsphere/vmware-what-is-new-vsphere51.pdf
– vSphere Enhanced VMotion: Share Storage was always one of the requirements to run VMotion. Not any more with the announcement of Enhanced VMotion today, you no longer need a shared storage to be able to benefit of VMotion. I can see many customers looking forward to this, specially smaller customers who could not afford a shared storage.… Read More
i need to build a 2 server cluster to host a frontend virtual machine.
the virtual machine should run on 1 node(most powerful) and in case of hardware/software failure run on 2 node (less powerful only for services availability, reliability)
should i use vmware or hyper-v for best costs/Reliability ratio?
thanks in advance.
As reliability go I would say VMware can beat hyper-V at any time, specially they have been out there for a lot longer & running in many production environment. I know many members of our team will argue on this, but if you come to me I would always implement VMware over Hyper-V when a critical application is involved.
In regards of cost, it will all depend. If you are going to need centeralized management & all the advanced featured VMware offers, then for sure your upfront cost will be higher than hyper-V. Though something to consider is that you are paying for many features, that Microsoft Hyper-V still failing to offer. You will be paying as well for the extra reliability that you will be getting as well. Please note if you start calculating the management suites of Microsoft Hyper-V & VMware & hardware required and distribute that money on the number of virtual machines you can run on both setups, then your cost per virtual machine will come very close.